Professor
Baker’s editorial on Conscience and the Unconscionable in Bioethics:
EDITORIAL
CONSCIENCE
AND THE UNCONSCIONABLE
ROBERT BAKER
Copyright
Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ABSTRACT
No Abstract
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIGITAL
OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01735.x
About DOI
Article Text
A year ago I
sat between a Catholic priest and a bioethicist on a panel1 debating President Bush's initiative
to extend 'antidiscrimination' protections to health professionals who refuse
to perform a 'legal medical service or procedure' for 'reasons of conscience.'
These 'civil rights' protections were designed to protect health professionals
against their professional societies and their employers who, the Bush
administration claimed, 'would force physicians to either violate their
conscience by referring patients for abortions . . . or
risk losing their board certification,' or their job. As Assistant Secretary of
Health Garcia, MD, explained, 'health providers shouldn't have to check their
conscience at the hospital door. The proposed rule will help ensure that
doesn't happen.'2
Full text:
Conscience
And The Unconscionable
Bioethics
Volume
23 Issue 5, Pages ii - iv
Published
Online: 26 May 2009
Journal
compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.